Sunday, February 16, 2020
News Consumers Are Falling Out Of Love With Their In-Car Touchscreens

Consumers Are Falling Out Of Love With Their In-Car Touchscreens

A recent study has shown that consumers’ satisfaction with their in-car infotainment touchscreens is dropping.

  • When compared to our phones and tablets, in-car screen UX lags.
  • Fingerprint smudging is a big complaint.
  • Difficult text entry is another one.

There was a time when reviewing a car meant turning up the volume on the audio system to find out how high the volume needed to be turned up before the speakers would vibrate. Today, we barely have time to turn up the knob, if partly because many new cars and SUVs don’t have any. We now spend considerable amount of time fiddling with the in-car infotainment through touchscreens to get a sense of the user-experience (UX).

While most are intuitive enough, some remain complex and complex. Some provide delayed responsiveness, poor graphics and a lack of reliability. In an investigation completed by the In-Vehicle UX (IVX) group at Strategy Analytics, car owners are falling out of love with these screens.

Consumers surveyed in the US, Western Europe, and China reported the following (from the original story):

  • Difficult text entry and excessive fingerprint smudging are common complaints among all car owners.
  • Because touchscreens have reached market saturation in the US, satisfaction with in-car screens has tailed off significantly.
  • However, touchscreens remain a relatively newer phenomenon in many car models in Western Europe (compared with the US) and thus their limitations are less prominent in the minds of car owners.
  • Overall touchscreen satisfaction fell for the fifth straight year in China, indicating a growing impatience for in-car UX to match UX found elsewhere in the consumer electronics space.

“Although hardware quality certainly figures in many of the usual complaints car owners have about their screens, it is not the sole factor. Cockpit layout and UI design can play important roles in mitigating some issues with in-car touchscreens,” said Chris Schreiner, Director, Syndicated Research UXIP.

We notice this every week. We’ve found that older (2 years!) designs are occasionally more satisfying to use with simpler, more straightforward . Many mid-range devices require two or four inputs to reach desired menus which mars the UX despite lovely graphics and excellent responsiveness. High-end units vary wildly depending on the make.

Trending Now

The Mazda3 wins the title of 2020 Canadian Car of the Year

This is the second year in a row for the Mazda3. The all-new Mazda3 was introduced for 2019 and has garnered numerous awards...

2021 Nissan Versa Makes a Come Back Before Canadian International Auto Show

2021 Nissan Versa brings back the Versa sedan which was discontinued in 2014 New Versa will serve as Nissan's entry-level model this year ...

The Most Dependable Models by Segment in the U.S.

This year’s J.D. Power U.S. vehicle dependability study marks the 31st anniversary of the yearly study. The study consists of measuring the number of...

2020 Subaru BRZ tS Revealed at the Canadian International Auto Show

The 2020 Subaru BRZ tS was unveiled at the Toronto Auto Show; It will be limited to only 50 copies; The 2020 BRZ...

A Toyota GR Corolla Hatchback Will Be Built.

Like the Toyota GR Yaris, North America probably isn’t cool enough for it. It will use the same turbocharged 3-cylinder with about 250-horsepower...
Matt St-Pierre
Matt St-Pierre
Trained as an Automotive Technician, Matt has two decades of automotive journalism under his belt. He’s done TV, radio, print and this thing called the internet. He’s an avid collector of many 4-wheeled things, all of them under 1,400 kg, holds a recently expired racing license and is a father of two. Life is beautiful. Send Matt an emai

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.