Brampton opposition centres on fears of low-value assembly work replacing full vehicle manufacturing.
Unifor and governments want Stellantis to restore promised plant production capacity.
Parts makers say Chinese EV investment must include Canadian assembly and North American sourcing.
Reported discussions between Stellantis and Zhejiang Leapmotor Technology over the future of the Brampton Assembly Plant have triggered a sharp reaction from political leaders, labour, and parts suppliers. The main dispute is centred on how much real manufacturing work would remain or occur in Canada.
The concern is not about Chinese EVs entering the Canadian market. It is about whether Brampton would become a final-assembly site for vehicles that are already largely built in China and shipped here in kit form. Critics argue that such an arrangement would deliver only a fraction of the employment, local procurement, and supplier activity associated with full vehicle production.
Ontario Premier Doug Ford and federal Industry Minister Melanie Joly have both rejected the idea. Unifor national president Lana Payne has also said Stellantis should honour its earlier commitment to restore the plant to its intended operating capacity rather than replace that promise with a lower-value assembly program.
Automotive Parts Manufacturers’ Association president Flavio Volpe said the economic difference between full production and knockdown-kit assembly is substantial. In comments, he described the proposed approach as vehicles “completely manufactured in China with Chinese components, then partially disassembled and brought here to be reassembled by several hundred workers, like IKEA furniture kits.”
Volpe argued that model would not recreate the supply-chain footprint that Ontario traditionally captures from vehicle manufacturing. He said a fully operating Brampton facility could again support roughly 10,000 to 12,000 jobs and generate about $3 billion annually in parts purchasing in Canada if production returned at scale.
The Next Opel EV Could be Developed by Stellantis’ Chinese Partner, Leapmotor
Despite this position, this is not a blanket opposition to Chinese EVs. Volpe said there is room for those vehicles in Canada if automakers commit to sourcing parts in North America and to full domestic assembly. In that scenario, Chinese-backed products could still contribute to Canadian employment and industrial activity rather than functioning mainly as imported content with minimal local value-add.
The issue carries extra weight because Brampton has been idle for more than two years while employees have waited for a restart. Stellantis had planned to retool the site, backed by federal support, but later announced that Jeep Compass production would move to Illinois instead.
Volpe also said Ottawa should classify knockdown kits as imports if they are overwhelmingly manufactured in China. He argues those volumes should count against any reduced-tariff Chinese EV quota available to Canada.
For suppliers, workers, and policymakers, the Brampton debate has become a test of whether future auto investment will rebuild Canadian manufacturing depth or settle for limited assembly work with little domestic return.
Source: CTV News
