Tesla models recorded salvage-title rates of approximately 18% to 19%.
Comparable vehicles aged five to eight years averaged a 7.5% rate.
Auction-based data does not represent Tesla’s entire registered vehicle fleet.
Tesla vehicles appear with salvage titles at substantially higher rates than comparable internal-combustion and electric vehicles, according to an EpicVIN analysis of auction and sales-listing data.
The vehicle-history provider reviewed 273 million vehicle identification numbers covering 338 models. Its August 2026 dataset showed that 13.7% of all vehicles examined carried salvage titles. Tesla models recorded rates of approximately 18% to 19%. In short, nearly one out of five Teslas in the U.S. were once declared a total loss in this study.
Vehicle age makes the difference particularly notable. Teslas included in the research averaged 5.2 years old, while EpicVIN calculated a 7.5% salvage-title rate for vehicles between five and eight years old. Tesla’s result was therefore more than double the average for that age group.
Tesla Sets October 1 Reveal for Long-Delayed Next-Generation Roadster
Among active brands, GMC ranked next with an 8.3% salvage-title rate. Brands recording higher percentages than Tesla included Saturn, Mercury and Pontiac, but those discontinued brands had fleets averaging more than 20 years old. Saturn posted a 24.4% rate with an average vehicle age of 22.8 years.
The Model 3 had the most salvage-title EVs in the dataset. The company identified 341,078 Model 3 sedans with salvage branding, equal to 19% of the Model 3 examples surveyed. The Model Y posted a slightly higher rate of 19.1%, although fewer vehicles were counted.
Other EVs did not follow the same pattern. The Nissan Leaf reported a 9.5% salvage-title rate and 2.4% for the Hyundai Ioniq 5. However, the Ioniq 5 entered the market several years after Tesla launched the Model 3 and Model Y, limiting direct age-based comparisons.

A salvage title generally indicates that an insurer declared a vehicle a total loss because estimated repair expenses exceeded an established portion of its market value. It does not necessarily indicate poor reliability, severe damage or unsafe driver behaviour.
Several economic factors could contribute to Tesla’s results. Electric vehicles have depreciated significantly, while Tesla’s repeated increases and decreases in new-vehicle price adjustments have put additional pressure on used values. Lower residual values make it easier for collision repairs to quickly exceed an insurer’s financial threshold for writing off a vehicle.
Repair expenses likely also play a role. Labour, replacement components, structural work and battery-related inspections can make damaged Teslas more costly to return to service.
The study does not measure Tesla’s entire registered fleet. Because EpicVIN sourced its records from auctions and sales listings rather than government registrations, damaged and rebuilt vehicles may be disproportionately represented. The findings therefore describe vehicles entering those channels.
Source: InsideEvs

